<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Scrappers Workshop</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scrappersworkshop.com/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scrappersworkshop.com</link>
	<description>Tools and classes for digital scrapbookers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 06:16:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Quick Tip Tuesday &#8211; Resizing Bunches! by Jenn</title>
		<link>http://www.scrappersworkshop.com/quick-tip-tuesday-resizing-bunches/comment-page-1#comment-41346</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 06:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scrappersworkshop.com/?p=6904#comment-41346</guid>
		<description>Charley, you&#039;re right, there is no automatic constraint in PS. I guess they figure PS people are better at math than PSE people! 

My suggestion to you would be if you HAD to use PS to do this to a folder of mixed images as you described, that you do it before doing any cropping or rotating. They all come out of the camera the same size which would let you plug in the exact numbers you need to resize smaller. 

If you DO crop the photos, why not crop to the pixel dimensions you need while you&#039;re at it? I do this a lot, I&#039;ll go in and fix up a pic (crop, brighten, sharpen, whatever), then resize to the size I want to print and save, resize for web and save and resize again to thumbnail and save. I even wrote an action to do this for me to save time. Then I don&#039;t have to resize the whole folder since I was going to open each image anyway I might as well do it while I&#039;m there. 

The only time I use the batch resize is if I&#039;m NOT going to do any editing at all to the photos, in which case they are SOOC (straight out of camera) and all the same size, so I can just plug in the numbers with the right proportions in PS. 

That said, I keep PSE around just for some of the color correction tools (and for writing tuts of course). Check out my little blue men...http://www.scrappersworkshop.com/quick-tip-tuesday-seeing-little-blue-men</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charley, you&#8217;re right, there is no automatic constraint in PS. I guess they figure PS people are better at math than PSE people! </p>
<p>My suggestion to you would be if you HAD to use PS to do this to a folder of mixed images as you described, that you do it before doing any cropping or rotating. They all come out of the camera the same size which would let you plug in the exact numbers you need to resize smaller. </p>
<p>If you DO crop the photos, why not crop to the pixel dimensions you need while you&#8217;re at it? I do this a lot, I&#8217;ll go in and fix up a pic (crop, brighten, sharpen, whatever), then resize to the size I want to print and save, resize for web and save and resize again to thumbnail and save. I even wrote an action to do this for me to save time. Then I don&#8217;t have to resize the whole folder since I was going to open each image anyway I might as well do it while I&#8217;m there. </p>
<p>The only time I use the batch resize is if I&#8217;m NOT going to do any editing at all to the photos, in which case they are SOOC (straight out of camera) and all the same size, so I can just plug in the numbers with the right proportions in PS. </p>
<p>That said, I keep PSE around just for some of the color correction tools (and for writing tuts of course). Check out my little blue men&#8230;<a href="http://www.scrappersworkshop.com/quick-tip-tuesday-seeing-little-blue-men" rel="nofollow">http://www.scrappersworkshop.com/quick-tip-tuesday-seeing-little-blue-men</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Quick Tip Tuesday &#8211; Resizing Bunches! by Charley</title>
		<link>http://www.scrappersworkshop.com/quick-tip-tuesday-resizing-bunches/comment-page-1#comment-41345</link>
		<dc:creator>Charley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 03:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scrappersworkshop.com/?p=6904#comment-41345</guid>
		<description>In Photoshop, there is no way to constrain proportions. This option appears only in Elements. I resize folders full of photos that have been cropped slightly or are a mix of vertical and horizontal. How do you constrain the proportions in Photoshop?!  I had to buy Elements just to have this option. Seems that there&#039;s got to be a way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Photoshop, there is no way to constrain proportions. This option appears only in Elements. I resize folders full of photos that have been cropped slightly or are a mix of vertical and horizontal. How do you constrain the proportions in Photoshop?!  I had to buy Elements just to have this option. Seems that there&#8217;s got to be a way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Quick Tip Tuesday &#8211; Don&#8217;t get SPLASHed! by Charley</title>
		<link>http://www.scrappersworkshop.com/quick-tip-tuesday-dont-get-splashed/comment-page-1#comment-41344</link>
		<dc:creator>Charley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 03:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scrappersworkshop.com/?p=3977#comment-41344</guid>
		<description>Thank you!!  Thank you!! A hundred times over, THANK YOU!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you!!  Thank you!! A hundred times over, THANK YOU!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Foto Friday&#8211;Have You Been Chimping? by Sarah</title>
		<link>http://www.scrappersworkshop.com/foto-fridayhave-you-been-chimping/comment-page-1#comment-41154</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 15:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scrappersworkshop.com/?p=6527#comment-41154</guid>
		<description>Ive also heard that chimping and deleting in camera can shorten the life of your memory card. Not sure if that&#039;s true or not, but another reason possibly to avoid chimping.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ive also heard that chimping and deleting in camera can shorten the life of your memory card. Not sure if that&#8217;s true or not, but another reason possibly to avoid chimping.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Quick Tip Tuesday &#8211; Undock those windows by Hans</title>
		<link>http://www.scrappersworkshop.com/quick-tip-tuesday-undock-those-windows/comment-page-2#comment-41125</link>
		<dc:creator>Hans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 07:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scrappersworkshop.com/blog/?p=1667#comment-41125</guid>
		<description>Thanks! This was just what i have been looking for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks! This was just what i have been looking for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

